Your Age Does Not Reflect Your I.Q.
December 9, 2008
A predominate feature of the structure of school is their need to place children with the same age (sometimes a year or two older) in the same class. The mistake in this monstrously stupid idea is the thinking (or lack of) that a child of seven years has identical intelligence to that of another child of seven years. In case you like school too much to notice what’s wrong with this assumption, I’ll be clear. It is ferociously rare for a child of seven years to have the exact same intelligence to that of another seven year old.
So what’s the problem Dangerous David? The problem is that within a class where there are contrasting intelligences, the material being ‘explored’ is all the same. Therefore a more intelligent person has to deal with work that is not challenging because some child is not smart enough to comprehend harder work. This is particularily noticeable in the early years of schooling, but it does not fade into non-existence in the later years, and this should not be acceptable.
But hey Dauntless David, wouldn’t the smart kids just do challenging material in their own time? Yeah, I’d like to see that happen. Only one to two percent of children would study at home of their own free will, I think. And due to the lack of mental nutrition that accomodates their presence in school, their skills will deteriorate to the level of the stupid kids, so it evens out nicely.
Now now Daring David, these smart children will just be put up a year, wouldn’t they? No. They won’t. And it’s not a good idea anyway. Especially what with the supposedly valuable social skills the would be lost. Somehow you learn social skills by doing crap with people your age. But how is a thirteen year old going to cope being in a class that contains fourteen year olds, or a six year old in a class of seven year olds? Chances are that child will not fit in and therefore not get these social skills.
Overall, schools (even though damaged beyond reasonable repair) should learn that being seven years old does not mean you have an I.Q. of seven like every other seven year old.
But schools are stupid, so they won’t learn. So they’re futile.
Entry Filed under: Uncategorized. .
14 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1.
TIG | December 9, 2008 at 11:45 pm
what’s up with dangerous david??
and dauntless david?
wtf?
2.
davidishere | December 9, 2008 at 11:49 pm
What do you mean? Everyone calls me Dangerous David.
3.
davidishere | December 9, 2008 at 11:50 pm
I am really…Dangerous…
Dangerously awesome whose magnificancy is only exceeded by his masculin charm.
4.
Harry | December 11, 2008 at 4:04 am
yep its true he is knows as dangerous David *cough* *cough*
I am 13 and i get along fine with my class David, so your theory of people younger not fitting in seems flawed, i know quite a few people a year young like me and it makes almost no difference.
5.
davidishere | December 11, 2008 at 9:41 am
Gosh, not Harry again. Assuming what you say is true, so what? So what if you supposedly cope well in your class? I said, “Chances are that child will not fit in and therefore not get these social skills.” So you could just be the minority. Jesus.
It’s just like that thing about atheists being smarter than everyone else. Even though it said, “Atheists tend to be more intelligent”, or whatever it was called, some douchebag says, ‘Oh no, your wrong, I’m very smart and I believe in the existence of God’. Jesus Christ, people are so retarded.
And who said you cope well? You produce terrible work and you live in fantasy land, and you tend to be wrong a LOT of the time. Wait, does arrogance fall into the category of well adjusted? If so, you are the most ‘well adjusted’ person I have ever met.
6.
davidishere | December 11, 2008 at 9:45 am
And oh, take some time to visit the links before ridiculing ideas based on only your experiences.
“More disturbing, older kids in a classroom are often a detriment to younger ones; they make the younger kids look dumb and immature. As a result, younger kids are more often diagnosed with behavior problems and more often held back a grade.”
Dumb and immature, that rings a bell.
7.
Harry | December 21, 2008 at 12:58 am
For one, dont start a sentence with and David.
David how can you call me dumb and immature when all you know about me is basically from another person. You know we were good friends until he started hanging out with you and then you both started insulting me. So maybe David you should get your facts first hand and see i am not that immature or dumb. Next time you think to insult me, ask yourself if there is any proof of these so called delusions or other things.
8.
davidishere | December 21, 2008 at 10:44 pm
What’s wrong with starting a sentence with “and”?
I was in your class Harry; I think I can safely say that I know who you are. Unless your actually Batman by night, which I don’t think you are. Immature? You brought a fucking Nintendo to a movie playing Pokemon. What are you, eight?
And anyway, this is about the futility of school, not any personal problems which you may, or may not have.
9.
Harry | December 23, 2008 at 12:16 pm
I did NOT bring my Nintendo DS to play pokemon during a movie ok, I brought it to the city because my friend asked me to and in the movie i later found he had stolen like 3 of my games including pokemon which i got when i was like 8 anyway.
10.
davidishere | December 24, 2008 at 1:35 am
Like THREE games??? oooh
Holy shit, I fucking saw you play it at the start of the god damn movie. And what’s that? You got a Pokémon game on the nintendo when you were eight? Ha, according to wikipedia, nintendo ds came out in 2005 in Australia so you couldn’t have got it when you were eight.
You must of been pretty grumpy with your like-minded friend taking (friends steal from each other??) your precious computer games. Why would your friend ask to bring your gameboy to the city unless he (and probably you) wanted to play; like multiplayer zombie battles or a good ol’ game of wizards vs. warlocks.
11.
TIG | December 24, 2008 at 1:55 am
вы оба неэрелый
12.
Harry | December 25, 2008 at 4:56 am
who cares 11 is still a very young age and i was much more immature than i am now. I didn’t turn it on at the start of the movie. The reason he told me to bring it was probably because he took the games.
13.
davidishere | December 25, 2008 at 8:48 am
You just finally admitted that you’re immature, thank you.
Are you saying people in grade 5-6 still play with dolls and figurines? Maybe only a small group – you and few other guys, but generally by the time people enter highschool, they would have abanded the trivial games which you indulge in (girls earlier).
I know you didn’t turn it on at the beginning of the movie because you were already playing it at the beginning.
And I have no idea how to comprehend that last part. Did your friend steal your gameboy games, and to give those games back to you, it was an absolute prerequisite that it took place in the city WITH your gameboy?
14.
davidishere | January 7, 2009 at 2:35 am
I just noticed from comment number 4 that Harry said that he knows a few people “a year young like me”. You hang out with baby’s? You’re a baby? Ha ha.
I know what he meant though; but it’s still funny.